How does the system of checks and balances affect legislative action?

The system of checks and balances is a fundamental principle of the U.S. government designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. Each of the three branches—executive, legislative, and judicial—has specific powers and responsibilities, and they are given the authority to oversee and limit the actions of the others.

The choice you selected highlights that this system enables different branches to review and limit each other's powers. For example, while Congress has the power to create laws, the President can veto legislation, and the judiciary has the authority to review laws and interpret them to ensure they align with the Constitution. This interdependence fosters a collaborative governance structure that requires consensus and accountability, ultimately leading to more balanced and equitable legislative action.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately encapsulate the essence of checks and balances. While the President's veto power is a specific example of checks and balances in action, it does not encompass the broader system that includes legislative and judicial review. The idea that laws must be passed unanimously does not align with legislative practice, as a simple majority is typically sufficient in Congress. Additionally, checks and balances do not remove the need for judicial review; in fact, judicial review is a key aspect of checks and balances, allowing the judiciary